![]() However, when you have two populations of which one is better then it's only natural that 5% of this better population will be better than 5% of the worse one. With Stalingrad it's less straightforward, of course. If you take 5% of whole population and 5% of the best 5% (basically the best 0,25%) - are you surprised that top 0,25% is better than the top 5%? ![]() "Hey" - says someone - "but isn''t it just that the red-pen-owners are on average better at calligraphy than the average green-pen-owner"?Īnd your answer is "but top 5% of those writing with red pen are still better than the top 5% of those writing with green!" Well, no sh*t. So you conclude that red pens are much better for calligraphy. Average scores achieved with red pens are much better than average scores achieved with green pens. Then you conduct more contests where people can use their green pens or (those who have them) red pens. 5% of the best receive an award red pen too. Let me put it this way: imagine conduct a national calligraphy contest. Then you look at the top 5% of players are see the same inconsistencies.Īnd guess what? The top 5% Zao and DM players tend to also be the top 5% Stalingrad players.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |